Astrologer

ASTROLOGER
By Vijay Medtia.

Unshaven in over a week, the young man reluctantly entered Pandit Motiram’s house. He took off his sandals and walked into the front room. Incense sticks were burning to either side of a large statue of Lord Ganesh, next to which sat the portly figure of the Panditji. He was talking on the mobile, and he motioned the young man to sit down with his left hand. Panditji was wearing a white silk top, and he had a bright red mark in the centre of his small forehead.
The ceiling fan gave little relief from the stifling heat and it blew the pages of the almanac in front of the Pandit.
‘Yes, yes. Thank you,’ said Panditji into the mobile with a smile. ‘It’s all God’s grace. I have nothing to do with it. How is everyone else in America? Fine. Good. Good. Here? The same. In India, everything is the same. Okay, God bless.’
He shook his head as he flicked the mobile shut.
‘People are calling me from America these days. I told him his business would improve about now. That was a thank you call. Now, how can I help you? What is your name?’
‘Arun.’
‘Do you have marriage problems, financial, health issues or girlfriend complications?’
‘Financial. I am out of work.’
‘Let’s have a look. Birth date?’
‘18th June, 1980.’

Panditji flicked through the almanac, chubby fingers covered with several gold rings encrusted with different gem stones. He took his time to caress the pages.
‘Ah yes, yes. Stars are unfavourable. It’s not your fault. Saturn has entered your tenth field, giving you problems these past three months.’
‘But Panditji, I have been out of work these past six months.’
‘No matter. Things will improve in one month only.’
‘How?’
‘We have to perform a pooja. It will take me three days. You have to wear a silver ring. The pooja will cost three thousand rupees.’
‘Panditji, I have no money!’
‘You expect you troubles to go away for free?’
‘No, but how will I manage the cost?’
‘Don’t worry. That’s what I’m here for. The money lender is a good friend. He will pay me the money to perform the pooja. You can repay him when you get a job.’
‘And this will work?’
‘You must have faith Arun. Didn’t you hear that call? All the way from the U. S of A, my reputation is spreading.’
‘Yes, yes that’s all fine, but I heard that you told Ramu that he would get married three months ago. He is still unmarried.’
‘That’s not my fault! Ramu didn’t do the pooja properly, and besides he smells. I told him about this, that he should improve his hygiene. Which girl will marry a smelly fellow? Any way if you have doubts, why don’t you go somewhere else? I don’t deal in small things any more. I get calls from the U.S of A now.’

‘All right Panditji. I’ll give this a try; everything else has failed.’
‘Good. All will be well, have patience.’

After three months the Panditji by chance bumped into the young man on the street.
‘Oh ho Arun, how are things with you? Did you get the job, are your worries over?’
Arun turned on him with a frown.
‘Panditji, before I came to you, only the stars were giving me trouble. Now the money lender is giving me trouble as well. He’s taking me to court!’

THE END.

Comments

Hi Vijay Namastey?? that

Hi Vijay

Namastey?? that right ?

I do like this and can see it balancing with something very serious on the next page.

will do the teacher thing and say what I like first :-)

the pandit is easily imaginable for me but I can't help drawing upon what I have seen in films so that helped too ! Bit of a charicature . Love description of the hands,rings etc and that is the best part for me

Arun could be described with more detail

The ending disappointed me a little and seemed too quick and rushed

Flash fiction, catching up with us all

Flash fiction, catching up with us all. Maybe it should be bling rather than flash. Like the story but it floats somewhat for me, meaning that I know from the outset how it’s going to play out as a sequence of events, and the events float on top of the emotions which are referred to without being revealed.

Example, the first line. You tell the reader how to understand the character and then only partially develop : the reluctance is linked to the scepticism, the unshaven is the stress of being out of work. Easy for the reader to infer but more difficult for them to feel. Part of the reason I think why the end has relatively little impact. When you have a few pages the technique you employ here can build suggestion and inference so that the reader becomes more involved with the character, but in under 600 words it would help if you could find a way of being more immediate.

As a suggestion look at your description in the opening paragraph: neutral with little modification, i.e. an impartial observer. Hemingway does this brilliantly by introducing tension that is not only implied but felt (which of course draws attention to the fact that the impartial third person observer is not impartial at all). Your technique is similar to his in that the modifiers in your opening paragraph are all adjectives and, with the exception of portly, more or less neutral. What you don’t do that Hemingway does is use them to build effect and emphasise association and contrast. There is an association between Ganesh and Panditji because of ‘large’ and ‘portly’, and contrast with ‘small forehead’, but there’s not enough of it to have much effect on the reader. You also don’t create tension in the relationship, it is clearly defined in the opening line : young man, Pandit at Pandit’s house.

Compare your opening paragraph to Hemingway’s ‘Hills Like White Elephants’.

The hills across the valley of the Ebro were long and white. On this side there was no shade and no trees and the station was between two lines of rails in the sun. Close against the side of the station there was the warm shadow of the building and a curtain, made of strings of bamboo beads, hung across the open door into the bar, to keep out flies. The American and the girl with him sat at a table in the shade, outside the building. It was very hot and the express from Barcelona would come in forty minutes. It stopped at this junction for two minutes and went to Madrid.

The passage not only brilliantly evokes what the setting looks like but what it feels like, and essentially it does so with only 16 out of the 132 words, which are :
‘no shade… sun… close…warm shadow…The American and the girl with him…shade…very hot’

An absence of shade which when it does occur reinforces the heat of the sun. Tension in a relationship, which foregrounds and contrasts political, gender and possibly age differences. Associations and disparities implied. Tension reinforced : it is very hot and they are waiting.

The reader, whether they want to or not, is compelled to make some kind of association and as a consequence to feel. It’s a very skilful manipulation. There’s no reason why you can’t do the same with your piece, Add a couple of lines, change a couple of the others, and Bob’s your uncle (unless, of course, he’s had a sex change operation, in which case he’s your auntie).

Thanks Martin, you have made

Thanks Martin, you have made some really valid points. I've still got a way to go before I'm upto Hemingway standards! But this piece was intended to be light and humourous, and one criticism I have of Hemingways work is that it lacks humour. Though you have it in spades and uncle doesn't need a sex change operation.

I'm writing a collection of short stories and I don't want them all to be bleak, you have to have balance- and if you read hemingways short stories, although brilliant- they don't half lack humour. That said i will work on the tension and thanks again for taking the time to comment on this short story, not bling fiction, which i think is around 200 words.

in his heart hemingway knew he was funny

what, you don't find Hemingway funny. no, neither do i. actually that isn't true, he has a wry, ironic humour, but it is pretty bleak.

same techniques can be adapted for humour, tension can be absurd or prepare the way.

actually maybe we should blog examples of writing we find humorous and explore why. or maybe not. as mark twain said : humour is like a frog, when you dissect it, it dies. or should that be croaks?

so you first, a passage you find humorous. we won't dissect it but we can at least draw around the edges (in white chalk, before somebody else dissects it and takes the body away).

humour

I think a sense of humour is a very personal thing.
What some people find funny others are offended by it.

For example I read a story last year about a Japanese man who worked hard all his life, and when he retired at the age of 65, his colleagues gave him a party on his last day. They joked, they laughed and at the end they all picked him up and threw him in the air. But as he came down they failed to catch him somehow. and the man died with a broken back!

Do you think there's anything funny about this story?
Pete there are novels that make you laugh out loud, but not many.

Vijay.

story sounds interesting

agree, humour is very personal. most people seem to like slapstick though.

story sounds interesting, if you got it wanna borrow it me. don't know if it is funny but we are kind of acclimatised to seeing death as funny, pulp fiction springs to mind.

example of kind of humour i've enjoyed, neil bissoondath has a one legged man winning a dancing competition and then being presented with the prize, which turns out to be a bicycle.

novels that are laugh out loud funny, can't remember the last one i read. probably easier to be funny in film/drama as opposed to being veined with humour, which seems to be the case in a lot of prose.

do you wanna post a list of novels that made you laugh out loud so we can all enjoy.

humour v tension

well as a multiple-award winning comedy writer and no-award winning thriller writer I feel I might usefully share some opinion on this. My sense is that humour is inimical to tension - it kills it, disspiates it. So I often build a scene, tension wise, then, if I am writing comedy, completely pull the rug from the tension using humour. Wheras if I'm writing suspense/thrillers, I keep the reader/audience on the rack, by avoiding humour or any other deflations. Best comedy writer to study? Play-wise, for me, its Neil Simon. Best 'tension' playwright? David Mamet. Can't really help on the novels version of these lists. Hemmingway? Yeah, he can be dry and maybe we should look at some of his pieces. He does interesting things.

save the green planet

my recommended film (korean) for tension and humour - sick humour and just humour humour
humour at points helps build the tension, tension makes humour that much more funny (i guess you need to laugh)
there's a theory that an audience/reader can only take so much tension so you have to break it, at least that was the explanation we given in school for the drunken gatekeeper scene in macbeth.
japanese and koreans do it differently. battle roayale a good example, book much better than the film, if over long. humorous? proper, but sick and very much in the situation. audition as well, the sickest moment in the film is some ways the funniest, but you don't laugh.
anyway, taking us away i think. i wouldn't say humour v tension, i would say humour from tension. make the opening a little more tense then let the absurdity break it. the whole thing is inherently absurd and therefore inherently funny, the two characters to an extent know that and are both acting out their roles. i see that as a form of comic tension. a bittersweet life korean film that brilliant example, or tears of the black tiger, which a thai film and a kind of absurdist, comic book western.
enough of the writing, how about a film night?

just read your piece which i

just read your piece which i enjoyed and i see your point with regards not trying to confuse the reader. :)

Dave you can confuse the

Dave you can confuse the readers if you want to- if it is part of your story (Martin de mello comes to mind ;-)
But you mustn't confuse the reader if you're not trying to- something that a lot of writers manage anyway!

Pete might know more about local short story comps. but there are loads of national short story comps, just check via the internet.
Vijay.

an enjoyable

read, it has something of the characteristics of the other very short story of yours I read - the one about the barber: trade, a customer, convincing local colour, short partraits, a conversation. I liked the use of the phone and you not being too obvious that it was a bluff by the guy. I found the ending milder than i expected... -pete

thanks pete. the story had

thanks pete. the story had to be less than 600 words for a competition. I've written two others. Actually for anyone writing novels, memoirs- it is good practice to write short stories for it helps you to keep your writing tight. less is more. i suppose this must apply to poetry as well, though i might be wrong on that.

I had my comment ready

I had my comment ready completed and all that before I read any others:

Funny

- from the punter in the street...

Ed

Thanks to punter in the

Thanks to punter in the street, Ed. Dike' was a great guy, with a sense of humour or maybe I just made him laugh!

Vijay.